I was thinking about the requirements last days, when worked with Shale-Test and JMock.
I noticed that there are only some tests for components in Tomahawk. Wouldn't it be great to have a test-case as a requirement for promoting a component ? And of course, Mike is right in *testing* with RI and example. -Matthias On 7/14/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree with Mike on both points. On 7/14/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/14/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > moving s:form has nothing to do with RI compatibility - we remain as > > compatible as before. > > > > So let me reopen the vote, s:form is well documented (example wouldn't > > help much), and it should be ok to move it to tomahawk. > > Has s:form been tested with the RI yet? (It's one of our promotion > requirements.) > > Also, I think an example should still be provided even if it's trivial > right now. > Future expansion on the s:form tag may not be trivial. >
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
