Hi Cagatay! > It would absolutely be excellent if h:form of myfaces is allowed to > render the client validation scripts No, this is no option, then a JSF-RI user has no chance at all to get our stuff running.
> then there is no need for a t:fom or any additinal tag. Now, that Martin made MyFaces fully RI compatible we can go the following way (I discussed it with Martin off list, though, we are open for comments anyway ;-) ) * add the validation stuff to t:form * add a single tag which adds the validation stuff if one didn't use t:form but h:form or trinidad:form So, one can have the comfort of t:form OR use the tag, so we can provide maximum flexibility. > That sounds also good to me Mario, to play with it a little longer > until these compatibility issues are hopefully resolved. We can also > take care of the client converter stuff there too. Also for now, > onkeypress type validations can be integrated. Yes, please, lets bring together client-validation and converter in sandbox - we can use the convertNumber to test our stuff and then move it to tomahawk - there is no pressure of time, is it? I'll try to do more work for the converter during the next week, maybe starting tomorrow. Did you look at the converter interface proposal? Ciao, Mario
