I deployed sandbox w/ RI and ran Martin's new example.
I figured out two issues. Inside of that example t:commandLink is not
working with the h:form AND h:commandLink is not working inside a
s:form.
Like:
That is not working:
<h:form ..>
...
<t:commandLink value="test2" action="#{formBean.testAction}"/>
...
</h:form>
and that is not working too:
<s:form ...>
...
<h:commandLink value="test1" action="#{formBean.testAction}"/>
...
</s:form>
Regards,
Matthias
On 7/15/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at commit log of "svn commit: r422260", I think yes.
I'll give it a try (sandbox w/ RI).
-Matthias
On 7/15/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok reading the end of the thread now it seems this has been addressed?
>
> Sean
>
> On 7/15/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > To sum up my point:
> > > * Its nothing bad to move now and document its "not compatible to RI"
> > > * But, as soon as possible we should have a look at making form/command*
> > > RI compatible
> >
> > So do we have a definitive answer on whether this works with the RI?
> > If not, then I'm -1 for promotion. We have had too many sloppy
> > releases and confusion lately. It can be used in the sandbox just as
> > easily as it can be used in tomahawk. IMO if its not ready to work
> > with the RI then its not ready to leave the sandbox. I don't know the
> > particulars of this component but this is my general feeling about any
> > sandbox component.
> >
> > > Mario
> >
> > Sean
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
