>you mean Martin's commit? Or what? Yes, obviously it is nicer to have uniform configuration parameters, but I do not feel this should hold up a release.
>We should have a unit test for each new commit ... during the complete >refactoring I am doing on Trinidad, I am *very*! happy to have such a >huge amount of test cases. That make my refactoring life very >comfortalbe! There was a time when I didn't feel this way. The spec means static requirements, so far less need for testing. But today core is a field of landmines. The relationship between cost and quality is exponential on every project, and we are definetly paying a lot these days in order to squeeze out the last 5% of defects in this piece of software. Four of five fixes result in another bug. Dennis Byrne >-Matthias > >> >> Dennis Byrne >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 01:23 PM >> >To: 'MyFaces Development' >> >Subject: Core 1.1.4 >> > >> >What's going on with this? Last I heard there was at least one major >> >bug? Can somebody summarize the status and likely timetable for >> >getting this out? This should be everyone's top MyFaces priority. If >> >you've got other personal stuff to do - fine - but this should be our >> >top priority otherwise. >> > >> >Sean >> > >> >> >> > > >-- >Matthias Wessendorf > >further stuff: >blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
