Ugg. I had a feeling this was the problem.
On 7/31/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/core/branches/1_1_4/impl/pom.xml?view=markup
It's pointed to the snap shot.
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.shared</groupId>
<artifactId>myfaces-shared-impl</artifactId>
<version>2.0.3-SNAPSHOT</version>
Dennis Byrne
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 02:32 PM
>To: 'MyFaces Development'
>Subject: Re: Core 1.1.4
>
>Ok the classes mentioned in MYFACES-1368 don't seem to be in the 1.1.4
>branch. So something is wrong here.
>
>Sean
>
>On 7/31/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >you mean Martin's commit? Or what?
>>
>> Yes, obviously it is nicer to have uniform configuration parameters, but I
do not feel this should hold up a release.
>>
>> >We should have a unit test for each new commit ... during the complete
>> >refactoring I am doing on Trinidad, I am *very*! happy to have such a
>> >huge amount of test cases. That make my refactoring life very
>> >comfortalbe!
>>
>> There was a time when I didn't feel this way. The spec means static
requirements, so far less need for testing.
>>
>> But today core is a field of landmines. The relationship between cost and
quality is exponential on every project, and we are definetly paying a lot these days
in order to squeeze out the last 5% of defects in this piece of software. Four of
five fixes result in another bug.
>>
>> Dennis Byrne
>>
>> >-Matthias
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Dennis Byrne
>> >>
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 01:23 PM
>> >> >To: 'MyFaces Development'
>> >> >Subject: Core 1.1.4
>> >> >
>> >> >What's going on with this? Last I heard there was at least one major
>> >> >bug? Can somebody summarize the status and likely timetable for
>> >> >getting this out? This should be everyone's top MyFaces priority. If
>> >> >you've got other personal stuff to do - fine - but this should be our
>> >> >top priority otherwise.
>> >> >
>> >> >Sean
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> >further stuff:
>> >blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> >mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>