what about using Jira first. for almost all commits ? I mean this makes us more efficent to follow the development "process" ;)
So each change to API, non trivial enhancement, etc must! go through jira. WDYT ? -Matthias On 8/22/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not concerned about the icla or not I am more concerned about the fact that patches sent offline and not through Jira. I mean, why ? On 8/22/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For a substantial contribution like this, we'll need a CLA on file in > any case (even if the code came in through a jira-issue). > > regards, > > Martin > > On 8/22/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/22/06, Ernst Fastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > After verifying the patches I send him Catalin was so kind and commited the > > > new sandbox component called PPRPanelGroup to the sandbox. > > > > Hi there! I think that's the commit I just commented on. :) > > > > Matthias already asked if there was a JIRA issue open, which might > > address my concern about whether we have (or need) a contributor > > license agreement [1] for the new code. > > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/index.html#clas > > > > -- > > Wendy > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
