Hi Matthias!
> The sort of "offline" development. Sending offline a patch to a
> committer for letting him commit the stuff is to me a -1. Looks like a
> "bypass".
Do you propose to use jira as mini-incubator?
I am not sure this is what it is meant for.

In this case it was committed to the sandbox, no? I like the idea to see
the "sandbox" as incubator even more, we are still free to remove stuff,
so this is not against "open development"

I think, for this (Google SoC) project, where Ernst worked together
closely with Martin it is good enough, and that way it is easier to
check the code quality AND if it works. If I had to trash my trunk with
its patch I suspect I'd check this code (given the pressure I currently
have)

For sure, it was not the best way how this code found its way into
myfaces, but let it be and we'll ensure for the future that it will go
better.


Beside this: I have a bad need for such a kind of stuff currently (so I
am biased ;-) ), so I'll check it before I go on with ajax4jsf or
ajaxAnywhere - I'll start in the next two days. (maybe today)

Ciao,
Mario

Reply via email to