No I'm not proposing we deal with generating HTML rendering business as far as dialogs are concerned. [I'll post a more detailed explanation on the shale dev list where that belongs.]
@Adam: If you're not already subscribed to shale dev we'd love to have you over there. Specifically, we could benefit from your insight regarding dialogs. @Everyone Else: This goes for you too. If you're using JSF you'll want to check out Shale which just builds on JSF and provides a lot of cool stuff missing from the spec. Sean On 8/24/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Adam Winer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Wrong list, sure, but since you opened up the can of worms... > >Is Shale really planning on getting into the HTML-rendering >business? > What do you mean by "HTML-rendering business"? We have custom components that do rendering. Clay has been around better than a year now and provides rich view composition using various templating options. Clay is a component in of itself that simple builds a subtree of components using a mechanism other than JSP tags. The clay component renders it children. When using full html (tapestry like) views or full xml (tiles like) views, the clay component is the only child under the view root so it pretty much renderers the full page. >-- Adam > Gary
