Wendy Smoak schrieb:
> I'm okay with splitting Tomahawk into multiple jars, as long as they
> are versioned and released together. Calling one of these jars
> 'myfaces-components-commons' to indicate that it can be used without
> Tomahawk, is also fine.
>
> I'm not in favor of establishing a commons module that gets versioned
> separately. Having to branch Shared for every release of core and
> tomahawk is bad enough already.
>
Actually I agree with wendy here...
a shared build and release should be mandatory,
otherwise it will be versioning hell.
