+1 from me for a release of Tobago. In any case - are there any new efforts to make Tobago more compatible to the rest of the JSF world?
We've all put a bit of effort into compatibility in tomahawk and impl, and I'd like to see some effort in the tobago code base as well... regards, Martin On 9/13/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this intended to be a Java 1.5-only release for examples? I get this error when trying to run the examples under java 1.4.2. java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: org/apache/myfaces/tobago/webapp/TobagoServletContextListener (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0) On 9/13/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > you can download the tobago examples from > > http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/myfaces-tobago-example-1.0.8-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz > > the 1.0.8-SNAPSHOT is the next release > > Mike Kienenberger wrote: > > See this thread: > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200604.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > On 9/13/06, L Frohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged" into > >> Tomahawk? > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM > >> To: MyFaces Development > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8 > >> > >> On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is > >> > a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only > >> > interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small > >> > number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem interested in > >> > Tobago is a danger signal. > >> > >> I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is > >> that it's > >> almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk user/developer. > >> > >> I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two > >> incompatible frameworks. > >> > >> I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk > >> (or at > >> least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it. > >> > >> If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each > >> other, I > >> think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project. > >> > >> Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons jar for > >> non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC > >> member to > >> vote on a Tobago release. > >> > >> > > >
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
