Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8

[Bernd Bohmann]

Hello Mike,

the examples are 1.5 only. A JDK 1.4 version would be produce a very big 
pom. The retrotranslated version of Tobago is new in this release.

If I get more feedback from the community may be I will setup JDK 1.4 
examples.

Regards


Bernd



Mike Kienenberger wrote:
Is this intended to be a Java 1.5-only release for examples?

I get this error when trying to run the examples under java 1.4.2.

java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
org/apache/myfaces/tobago/webapp/TobagoServletContextListener
(Unsupported major.minor version 49.0)


On 9/13/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,

you can download the tobago examples from

http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/myfaces-tobago-example-1.0.8-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz 


the 1.0.8-SNAPSHOT is the next release

Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> See this thread:
>
> 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200604.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

>
>
> On 9/13/06, L Frohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged" into
>> Tomahawk?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM
>> To: MyFaces Development
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
>>
>> On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces 
committer is
>> > a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only
>> > interested in Tobago.  On the other hand, the fact that only a small
>> > number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem 
interested in
>> > Tobago is a danger signal.
>>
>> I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is
>> that it's
>> almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk user/developer.
>>
>> I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two
>> incompatible frameworks.
>>
>> I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk
>> (or at
>> least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it.
>>
>> If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each
>> other, I
>> think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project.
>>
>> Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons 
jar for
>> non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC
>> member to
>> vote on a Tobago release.
>>
>>
>