I just followed our official release procedure that was established by Sean Schofield: http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Release_Procedure
Point 6 says: "Take a vote on the dev list (only PMC votes are binding). Vote is taken against a specific SVN revision number (not release candidate necessary)" Wendy, is this outdated? Maybe this procedure was established before the "people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/m2-staging-repository" did actually exist? To get the core 1.1.5 release out as soon as possible I tend go on with this procedure. After the release is out we can start a discussion for a new procedure. Is that ok? --Manfred On 2/3/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/2/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm in the past several releases, there was one vote thread for the > product and its dependencies, i.e. myfaces-core, myfaces-shared, + > maven-project all voted as one thread. New policy? It's up to the release manager each time, as long as everything passes a vote before it is released to the general public, there's no set procedure. This seems to be a vote for just the 'maven' things, but even so we should be voting on the actual artifacts, not on a svn revision. Are they staged somewhere? (Staging them might be complicated since a glance at "mvn help:effective-pom" says that distribution management is pointed at the ibiblio-rsync repository. I thought I had rearranged so that everything would go to people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/m2-staging-repository.) -- Wendy
