Mike Kienenberger schrieb: > You've answered some of the management issues, but you still haven't > addressed what the difference between "tomahawk and/or sandbox" and > "fusion" will be. > Since I am probably the first one who will use it (call me guinea pig) fusion is an application stack/framework, I have yet to check it out (I have not seen the code) It is sort of in similar domains as shale but different areas and targets (the conversation is moved from the tag into spring etc...)
> From my understanding so far, this is still just a collection of > components, and I don't see why it needs to be separate from the No not really, I am not sure how much is in (not got the code yet), because I am currently only interested in the spring conversation context, which I can hook into jpa for conversation/transaction handling. But it definitely is not just a set of components ;-)
