It's not an arbitrary and unnecessary split - as: - it's not a component library, it is about glue-code - it works with any component library, not only tomahawk - it has dependencies to Spring, and I personally don't think tomahawk should have some
regards, Martin On 2/22/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You've answered some of the management issues, but you still haven't addressed what the difference between "tomahawk and/or sandbox" and "fusion" will be. From my understanding so far, this is still just a collection of components, and I don't see why it needs to be separate from the sandbox or tomahawk. Our stated goal in the past has been to unify the various subprojects (ie, merge tomahawk and trinidad; merge tomahawk and tobago). This seems contrary to that goal since fusion (an ironic name in this context) is making an arbitrary and unnecessary split of the tomahawk project. On 2/22/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mike! > > In the future, please remember that such reviews and conclusions > > *must* be made on the mailing list. > Ok, sorry for this. > > > As to the actual merits of the subproject, I don't understand what > > value it adds to have this in both the sandbox and in "fusion". How > > do the two subprojects differ? Is it just a matter of different > > dependencies? > The parts in the sandbox will deleted once the setup of the new project > has settled down. > Afterwards a release of MyFaces Fusion (or whatever name it will have in > the end) should follow soon. > > For the user it is easier to recognize than that there is just another > competitor in this area (JSF, ORM, etc) > > > Ciao, > Mario > >
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
