that would be another very good option -M
On 2/23/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option as well. other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version numbers get out of sync. regards, Martin On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, thanks for your feedback. > Branch 1.1.5 created. > > --Manfred > > > On 2/23/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The new tomahawk release number is a trade-off. > > > We must decide between > > > - releasing tomahawk 1.1.4 which is not compatible to core 1.1.4 and > > > therefore might confuse users > > > - skipping tomahawk 1.1.4, stay in sync with core and have a tomahawk > > > 1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the current core 1.1.5 > > > > +1 for Tomahawk 1.1.5 this time around, which will be compatible with > > Core 1.1.5. > > > > (There is plenty of information in the archives if anyone asks "what > > happened" to 1.1.4. As Paul points out, Tomcat skips version numbers > > in their public release series.) > > > > -- > > Wendy > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
