Hi Gary! > > Tomahawk and Tobago have their own strategies too. Often they can > play nicely together, but since they don't standardize on a single API > for delivering these Web 2.0 features, they will never truly be > interoperable (IMHO). > Yea, but thats why we should concentrate (IMHO). If we would like to get out of line to the argument to being not compatible with each other (which has been solved in many areas !) we should work together instead of just fire up a new group - and we all still solve the same problems then.
I think MyFaces will be the looser if we split due to the "interoperability question". Compared to the "big player" (sun, oracle, exadel, jboss, .... - (if they are at all ;-) )) the user will always think WE do something wrong ..... BTW: I can only speak for tomahawk, since tobago has gone a different route in many terms I don't know if and how interoperable they are or could be. Ciao, Mario
