(forwarded the wrong email before)
Hi,
Omar today mailed the proposal for further discussion to general list.
-M
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mar 22, 2007 8:16 PM
Subject: RE: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF
To: [email protected]
Omar Tazi wrote:
This is a proposal to donate a rich component library for the JavaServer
Faces technology to the Apache Software Foundation.
Please compare, just for our information, with:
http://myfaces.apache.org/tobago/
http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/
Based on a quick Google and a USPTO search there doesn't seem to be
anything that would cause trouble with the "RCF" name.
Er, what about Eclipse RCF? Rich Client Framework. But this relates to the
question I asked above: do we need a separate project and name for multiple
sets of Faces components? Are we keeping them separate, or eventually just
having a box of parts?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
