Yes, my original message said "non-trivial, non-sandbox", but when I typed it in again, I didn't include it. Sorry for the confusion.
On 5/12/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I completely agree for anything non-trivial, but what about comparative trivia like: - whitespace changes - deleting unused variables - fixing spelling errors - etc.. There's no value to mentioning these in release notes, and if you have a thorough SVN commit message (which should always be required practice), no one will wonder why it was done... Just looking for the happy medium. If you put too much procedure on checkins, then people will: - Merge two tasks into one checkin (very bad procedure) - Not even bother with simple stuff All that said, I absolutely should have referred some checkins last week to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-135 Mea culpa! -- Adam On 5/10/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just an FYI that the standard MyFaces practice is that all non-sandbox > commits should have JIRA issues (and references in the commit log). > > This makes it easier to create release notes as well as to research > why a change was made. >
