Quite a symbolic act :) Mvgr, Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > yes, > > -0 > > :-) > > On 5/14/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Good point! >> >> I revise my vote to >> -0 >> >> regards, >> Manfred >> >> On 5/14/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hi! >> > > I am -0 on placing Continuum messages on a different mailing list >> > > because I like seeing the commit message(s) followed by a Continuum >> > > success/failure message. The Continuum message is a nice >> confirmation >> > > that the commit(s) did or did not break the build. Email clients can >> > > be configured to filter messages if the user prefers to not see the >> > > Continuum message or see the message in a different folder. The >> > > converse can also be said, filtering commit and Continuum messages >> > > into the same folder. >> > Yep, these are my thoughts too. >> > >> > When Continuum is running stable I really prefer its messages >> showing up >> > after the commit. Even a newbie developer should see that every commit >> > triggers an (nearly) immediate action. >> > In the end every developer should subscribe to the continuum >> > notification list too ... so no need to split them. >> > >> > Ciao, >> > Mario >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> http://www.irian.at >> Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, >> Development and Courses in English and >> German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> > >
