I don't see why - what is the difference between a link to a page and an iframe pointing at that page? It's exactly the same HTTP request. If <a href> should use getActionUrl(), then iframe and frame srcs also should.
-- Adam On 6/13/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam mentions iframe/frame-src attributes... I guess those would qualify as resource-url's ? regards Alexander -----Original Message----- From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:25 AM To: MyFaces Development Subject: Re: Portlets & <a href="">: resource or action URL? Definitely encodeActionUrl, yes, from what I read in the portlet spec. Obviously the original link implementors thought the distinction was about form post versus get - but the distinction is about query links/form submissions versus inclusion of resources in the page. regards, Martin On 6/14/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simple (I imagine) question: > > For a link's "href", should we be calling encodeResourceURL() > or encodeActionURL()? > > I've always assumed these are action URLs. I see other > code out there (MyFaces outputLink, for example) that > considers these resource URLs. > > (Whatever answer we arrive at should apply equally to > iframe and frame "src" attributes, I believe). > > -- Adam > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
