Yes, even if JEE5 is not widely adoped, it can be adopted as of now. Geronimo 2 uses MyFaces 1.2 as part of the JEE5 implementation. I would like to see the Apache alternative to glassfish released (on July?) with an official release of MyFaces 1.2... And then, what? Why myfaces 1.2 if the RI 1.2 is out there for whoever needs JSF 1.2?
Also people are frequently asking for MyFaces 1.2 too, I've reviewed maven faces plugin and I'm +1 to revote and release these plugins. Cagatay, On 6/16/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, even if JEE5 is not widely adoped, it can be adopted as of now. Geronimo 2 uses MyFaces 1.2 as part of the JEE5 implementation. I would like to see the Apache alternative to glassfish released (on July?) with an official release of MyFaces 1.2... And then, what? Why myfaces 1.2 if the RI 1.2 is out there for whoever needs JSF 1.2? Bruno On 16/06/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, > > to be honest, JavaEE 5 isn't really wide adopted, yet. And in most > cases, MyFaces1.1.x + Facelets + Spring just work fine. Jetty/Tomcat > is enough :) > > -Matthias > > On 6/16/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Damn it guys! Is there no interest in releasing MyFaces 1.2? :-( > > > > Thanks Matthias, > > > > Bruno > > > > On 16/06/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok, > > > > > > thanks for voting. > > > We don't release these artifacts, since we got only two +1 votes. > > > Means, takes longer to get MyFaces 1.2 out, since these bits are a dependency. > > > > > > Greetings, > > > Matthias > > > > > > On 6/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 120 release of the Trinidad > > > > MyFaces Plugins out. This is the first release of the 1.2 plugins. > > > > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]). > > > > > > > > Please take a look at the "1.2.0" artifacts and vote > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, > > > > and why.............. > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/trinidad120plugins/ > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org >
