On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 13:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there anything in shale-goodies yet?
>
> The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app, and a few
> related experiments.
>
> Craig
>
Thanks. Looking forward to it. Has any one ported Petstore 2.0 to Spring
JPA and tomcat or Jetty?
Craig, is there any thought on Shale and WebBeans? (Hope not to offend
any one on this list)
I'm on the expert group for WebBeans[1], along with a bunch of other
people. There will definitely be some functional overlap on what
Shale calls the dialog manager -- you will really really really want
to pick one framework for that kind of stuff, be it Shale's,
Trinidad's, Orchestra's, Seam's, WebBeans's, Spring's ... but other
than that there's no reason you shouldn't be able to use Shale
features and WebBeans features together, since they are both built on
top of JSF APIs.
Craig
[1] http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=299
BaTien
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > > On 6/26/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >> code.google.com is fine for that.
> > > > > I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not
> > > > > allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when
> > > > > depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1].
> > > > > Any objections about it?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ciao,
> > > > > Mario
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > ++1
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that
> > > was used for Shale "extras" that didn't fit into the usual Shale
> > > project:
> > >
> > > http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies
> > >
> > > Doesn't "myfaces-goodies" have a nice ring?
> > >
> > > Craig
> >
> >
