I would rather switch to 1.2 now so that new users use 1.2 right away.
In a sense it's going to be better for them since they won't have a conversion cost later. I'm currently converting an application to JSF 1.2and it's not as easy as dropping new libs in if you don't want to have any deprecated usage warnings left in the converted project. Furthermore JSF 1.2is the version that's part of JEE 5, not JSF 1.1. So I think the real issue is more with the current JSF 1.1 users. It might be rude to switch to JSF 1.2 so fast after the first release, but I wonder if there's "good time" at all for this kind of action. Personally, I don't see any so I think the sooner the better as less harm will be done. Regards, ~ Simon On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, we were talking about this in past, and in the past (14 month ago or so), we agreed to keep MyFaces 1.1.x to be the trunk. Now, we have a (first) release of MyFaces 1.2.x out there, so it *might* make more sense now, than in the past. However, we recently asked, but we never heard much back for others (7 "votes"). Therefore an "official" vote was needed. Glad you jumped in. It's not that we need to "push" this, now. I am personally fine in switching to 1.2.x (on trunk) later. Looks like we need to discuss this, in more details. Perhaps it's good to wait, and try to get a *first* step into a version of Tomahawk/Tobago that are JSF-1.2-style. -Matthias On 7/19/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Got a question here: making the JSF 1.2 core > trunk seems like a no-brainer. But what about Tomahawk > and Trinidad? Will those switch over to be JSF 1.2-based > on their trunks, or should we keep JSF 1.1 as the basis > for their trunks? > > The coder in me wants to bump to JSF 1.2, but it's > hard to imagine that the community in general is ready. > WDYT? > > -- Adam > > > On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yeah, I'll do that now :) > > > > I guess, this topic also become more attention, when it's a vote ;) > > > > -M > > > > On 7/19/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > > > I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-))) > > > > > > Votes are cheap :-) > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > further stuff: > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
