Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

[Paul Spencer]

I do not like the idea of "current (symlink to jsf1.2)".  To me JSF 1.1 
and 1.2 are two products and should be treated as such.

Paul Spencer
Andrew Robinson wrote:
Not to be too anal, but would:

current (symlink to jsf1.2)
jsf1.1
jsf1.2

Be a little more "tidy"?

It should also consider the web site right? Right now, it only shows
the current/trunk branch. Perhaps the site should be versioned as
well. Example using tomahawk:

myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/current (symlink to 1.2)
myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/1.2
myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/1.1

On 7/20/07, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Why not":  how many users are ready to make the jump to
> JSF 1.2?  Many of our users, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Tobago, are
> on JSP 2.0 or earlier.

Yeah, but we're just making 1.2 the trunk, not forcing people to use 1.2.

Again two active branches current11 and current12 sounds good to me, 
where
current12 has the trunks

Cagatay

On 7/20/07, Matt Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
> On 7/20/07, Adam Winer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Why not":  how many users are ready to make the jump to
> > JSF 1.2?  Many of our users, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Tobago, are
> > on JSP 2.0 or earlier.
> >
> > It'd make my life way easier if the Trinidad trunk were 1.2,
> > definitely, I just doubt that would hold true for the users.
> >
> > Just for starters, what about the committers?  How many
> > of us can stick to 1.2?
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> > On 7/20/07, Cagatay Civici < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > About subprojects, I think the case is same for them, if we make 
1.2
the
> > > trunk for api, why not set 1.2 branches of subprojects as trunks 
too?
Also
> > > after doing it, we may need to reconfigure current and current12 
too.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/19/07, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Assuming MyFaces 1.1.7 is released so the SVN configuration in 
the
POM
> > > > of next version of MyFaces will be correct.  Otherwise people,
including
> > > > Continuum, who are using 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT from the repository 
will be
in
> > > > for a very big surprise.
> > > >
> > > > Qualified +1 otherwise -0 for the above reason
> > > >
> > > > Although I missed the discussion, my preference would be for a
MyFaces
> > > > 1.1 and 1.2 trunk/branch since both are active products.
> > > >
> > > > Paul Spencer
> > > >
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > this is a vote for making the JSF 1.2 efforts by our group to
become
> > > > > the current trunk.
> > > > > Currently the JSF 1.2-work lives on a branch ( 
1.2.1-SNAPSHOT is
the
> > > > > current version).
> > > > >
> > > > > Please cast your vote
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > [ ] +1 for moving the myfaces 1.2.x to trunk
> > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > [ ] -1 and why..............
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > -M
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>