On 9/26/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As for issue #1, I think we've pretty much got all of the undated items > done, but we're waiting for approval from the Spec lead on an open issue > regarding the API of the bridge. Initially the Spec lead was following > the pattern of JSR-168 and he was including the API as part of the > spec. This meant that the API package would need to remain unchanged > and all copyrights would continue to be held by Oracle. This is why > Pluto, for instance, builds against the JSR-168 binary api package. The > Expert Group discussed this and seems to be on-board with only making > the Java docs part of the specification so we submitted an inquiry to > the JCP regarding this issue and are waiting to hear back. Once the > spec lead returns and gives his approval, I'll upload the re-licensed > files to JIRA and we can pretty much fill everything out.
what happens when there isn't an approval ? > > As for issue #2, I'm not sure what we need to do with that. I think > incubator said this could be handled as a code donation and NOT go > though the formal incubator process, but I'm not sure if this > constitutes a "vote" or not. I'm pretty sure we have tentative approval > from us (MyFaces) to accept the code donation and the ip-clearance seems > to indicate that this would be good enough but we could have a more > formal vote if people want. > > Scott > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > Hi, > > > > so, the page is online now ([1]). > > > > All we need is: > > -fill out the missing things > > -have a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or was there already a vote, can't > > remember....) > > > > -Matthias > > > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jsr-301-ri.html > > > > On 9/3/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> This is the form that needs to be prepared. Manfred, can you take over > >> filling it out? It has to be an official or a member who does this. > >> > >> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html > >> > >> regards, > >> > >> Martin > >> > >> JSR 301 Reference Implementation Codebase Intellectual Property (IP) > >> Clearance Status > >> Description > >> > >> Describe the incoming codebase, including whether it is a large set of > >> patches, new functional modules, etc. > >> ---------------------------- > >> > >> The codebase is the JSR 301 reference implementation. > >> > >> ---------------------------- > >> > >> Project info > >> > >> * Which PMC will be responsible for the code: Apache MyFaces > >> > >> * Into which existing project/module: Apache MyFaces > >> > >> * Officer or member managing donation: Manfred Geiler (?) > >> > >> Completed tasks are shown by the completion date (YYYY-MM-dd). > >> Identify the codebase > >> date item > >> 2007-09-03 If applicable, make sure that any associated name does not > >> already exist and is not already trademarked for an existing software > >> product. > >> > >> MD5 or SHA1 sum for donated software: (Note versioned software used to > >> calculate sum in parentheses). - Scott, can you take this over? > >> > >> Copyright > >> date item > >> ....-..-.. Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights > >> to the ASF have been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights > >> for the package, the core code, and any new code produced by the > >> project. > >> ....-..-.. Check and make sure that the files that have been donated > >> have been updated to reflect the new ASF copyright. > >> > >> Identify name recorded for software grant: the name of the grant as > >> record in the grants.txt document so that the grant can be easily > >> identified > >> Verify distribution rights > >> > >> Corporations and individuals holding existing distribution rights: > >> > >> * For individuals, use the name as recorded on the committers page > >> > >> date item > >> ....-..-.. Check that all active committers have a signed CLA on > >> record. > >> ....-..-.. Remind active committers that they are responsible for > >> ensuring that a Corporate CLA is recorded if such is required to > >> authorize their contributions under their individual CLA. > >> ....-..-.. Check and make sure that for all items included with the > >> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the right > >> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. > >> ....-..-.. Check and make sure that all items depended upon by the > >> project is covered by one or more of the following approved licenses: > >> Apache, BSD, Artistic, MIT/X, MIT/W3C, MPL 1.1, or something with > >> essentially the same terms. > >> > >> Generally, the result of checking off these items will be a Software > >> Grant, CLA, and Corporate CLA for ASF licensed code, which must have > >> no dependencies upon items whose licenses that are incompatible with > >> the Apache License. > >> Organizational acceptance of responsibility for the project > >> > >> Related VOTEs: > >> > >> * The VOTE thread accepting the donation may happen either before > >> or after IP clearance. Adoption by lazy concensus is acceptable but > >> not recommended. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> http://www.irian.at > >> > >> Your JSF powerhouse - > >> JSF Consulting, Development and > >> Courses in English and German > >> > >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
