On Nov 29, 2007 6:06 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007 5:57 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I'm going to try to put together a proposal for some items it add to the
> > jsf commons fairly soon for your purusal.  First off, however, I'd like
> > some technical information on this project as it may effect how the
> > project is set up.
> >
> > 1. Which version of JSF will be the minimum for this project?  One of my
> > proposals involves needing an ExternalContextWrapper and the version of
> > JSF does make a difference.  I, personally, would like to see this based
> > off 1.2 but if we need a 1.1 Faces Commons then I would recommend both a
> > 1.1 and a 1.2 branch.
>
> here we go;
> my understanding is, that 1.1 is a must

on the other hand;

this is a "new" project, so when it is based on JSF 1.2 API, it would be OK,
but I think JSF 1.1 is to much used...

But... two versions/trunks/branches are a PITA :-)

>
> >
> > 2. What is the minimum JDK we are going to use for this project.  My
> > preference would be J2SE 5 for the build.  I could even live with making
> > sure that code can be compiled with J2SE 5 in 1.4 compatibility mode but
> > I think we need to be able to support generics at the very least.  Of
> > course if we're basing the commons project off of JSF 1.2, J2SE5 is a
> > no-brainer.  :)
>
> JSF 1.1 => java1.4
> JSF 1.2 => JDK5
>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Reply via email to