The current state is not that it is done for JSF 1.1 only. We just started the two classes with that :-) The switch to JSF 1.2 is very cheap, since it is via config.
-M On Dec 3, 2007 8:47 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you're going to support 1.1, support 1.4. Otherwise, just stick > with JSF 1.2. > > I know where I do my primary JSF work, the major holdup has been JDK > 1.5, which was only recently adopted, not JSF 1.2, per se. > > I'm personally good with JSF 1.2 only, though, for this new project. > > > On Dec 3, 2007 2:43 PM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > +1 on JSF 1.2 only > > > +0.5 on 1.1 support with JDK 1.5 required on both. > > > -1 on 1.1 w/ 1.4 > > > > > +1 on that view! > > > > Ciao, > > Mario > > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
