I think that is a good compromise; by that we also can "filter" later on the interesting parts for 1.1 (which can be done, by those, that actually care on 1.1)
which is easier... since the most do care on 1.2 (since it is a NEWER api) -M On Dec 5, 2007 11:39 PM, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, > > I'm fine if we are starting with 1.2 only. We can look for 1.1 > interesting parts later. > But I don't like a commons jsf 1.2 only vote. > > Bernd > > Scott O'Bryan schrieb: > > > Bernd, > > > > I do. :) Common's multi-part form handling (file uploads) will need to > > work in both a Portal and Servlet environment before something like > > Trinidad will be able to use it. For this, I'm proposing that such a > > handler use the Configurator sub-system. The configurator Subsystem > > must override the ExternalContext which has changed a great deal between > > 1.1 and 1.2. Having done multi-part form handling in Trinidad for both > > frameworks, I can tell you that a generic implementation of this is > > quite a bit different in both branches (largely because of the > > setRequest() and setResponse() methods in 1.2). > > > > Currently, Tobago, Trinidad 1.1 and Tomohawk all support multi-part form > > handing for servlets. I don't see any reason why we should change these > > implementations. > > > > Scott > > > > Bernd Bohmann wrote: > >> -1 > >> > >> I don't see any reason why a commons fileupload should not support 1.1 > >> > >> Can someone define what commons API means? > >> > >> Is this just a subproject of commons like commons validator or commons > >> converter? > >> > >> Scott O'Bryan schrieb: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Mario Ivankovits wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>>> Lets make the myfaces commons JSF API an official vote so we can have > >>>>> a fixed time frame on this decision > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 [ ] -- make JSF 1.2 the minimum requirement for the new myfaces > >>>>> commons project > >>>>> +0 [ ] -- you don't mind supporting a 1.1 trunk in addition to a 1.2 > >>>>> trunk > >>>>> -1 [ ] -- you feel that 1.1 should be required and why you feel that > >>>>> it is needed > >>>>> > >>>>> My vote: +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> -Andrew > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
