We can start with a 1.2 jsf commons api. But it should be allowed to provide a 1.1 jsf commons later.
Bernd Scott O'Bryan schrieb: > Well it was mainly for the API's (not the other pieces). So are you > asking for us to have both a 1.1 and a 1.2 jsf commons api? > > Scott > > Bernd Bohmann wrote: >> Ok, >> >> I'm fine if we are starting with 1.2 only. We can look for 1.1 >> interesting parts later. >> But I don't like a commons jsf 1.2 only vote. >> >> Bernd >> >> Scott O'Bryan schrieb: >> >>> Bernd, >>> >>> I do. :) Common's multi-part form handling (file uploads) will need to >>> work in both a Portal and Servlet environment before something like >>> Trinidad will be able to use it. For this, I'm proposing that such a >>> handler use the Configurator sub-system. The configurator Subsystem >>> must override the ExternalContext which has changed a great deal between >>> 1.1 and 1.2. Having done multi-part form handling in Trinidad for both >>> frameworks, I can tell you that a generic implementation of this is >>> quite a bit different in both branches (largely because of the >>> setRequest() and setResponse() methods in 1.2). >>> >>> Currently, Tobago, Trinidad 1.1 and Tomohawk all support multi-part form >>> handing for servlets. I don't see any reason why we should change these >>> implementations. >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> Bernd Bohmann wrote: >>> >>>> -1 >>>> >>>> I don't see any reason why a commons fileupload should not support 1.1 >>>> >>>> Can someone define what commons API means? >>>> >>>> Is this just a subproject of commons like commons validator or commons >>>> converter? >>>> >>>> Scott O'Bryan schrieb: >>>> >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Mario Ivankovits wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>>> Lets make the myfaces commons JSF API an official vote so we can >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> a fixed time frame on this decision >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 [ ] -- make JSF 1.2 the minimum requirement for the new myfaces >>>>>>> commons project >>>>>>> +0 [ ] -- you don't mind supporting a 1.1 trunk in addition to a 1.2 >>>>>>> trunk >>>>>>> -1 [ ] -- you feel that 1.1 should be required and why you feel that >>>>>>> it is needed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My vote: +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Andrew >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
