Yes, which mean that I might make such propositions or support them, but I'm
not the only member and I'm pretty such that some members see apparent
backward compatibility to be a precept above anything else.


~ Simon

On Jan 15, 2008 11:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> aren't you part of the EG ?
> :-)
> -M
>
> On Jan 15, 2008 7:46 AM, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Personally, considering there's always backward compatibility issues
> anyway,
> > I wouldn't mind seeing some new ones if it was to allow JSF to be much
> > faster, easier to use and more extensible. Like standardizing FacesBean
> for
> > instance. If done correctly, it would give a decent speed boost, allow
> > easier and more intelligent state saving as well as many other goodies.
> I'd
> > really like to see a way to extends the Lifecycle more easily as well,
> maybe
> > implying standardization of the Phase classes. Maybe adding new phases
> as
> > well like register resources occurring before render to push all
> > dependencies in a rendering context and thus allowing all script
> references
> > to be rendered in the head element thus respecting w3c. A coherence
> > validation phase as well as a mean to execute a Callback on the whole
> tree
> > (to implement custom phases for example) wouldn't be unwelcome either.
> > Anyway, we'll see that in due time.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > ~ Simon
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 15, 2008 10:33 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > nice...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 15, 2008 7:23 AM, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > On Jan 15, 2008 4:16 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > We here can only talk... The spec itself is made behind closed
> doors
> > ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Not really "closed"
> > > > "ajar" would be a better word: at least everyone is allowed to
> comment
> > > > on early drafts
> > > >  ;-)
> > > >
> > > > --Manfred
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>

Reply via email to