If tomahawk is going to be split into pieces, then it really does not make 
sense to completely change the build approach. It currently works, so let's 
just stay with what is already there.

Regards, Simon

---- Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> I think that Leonardo is working on generating the components classes
> tlds, facelet-taglibs with the maven-faces-plugin - I'm pretty sure
> this makes sense.
> 
> As this will then mean there is a switch to either use JSF1.2 or 1.1
> in the generation (hopefully this will work) both 1.1.7 and a 1.2
> based version could be released.
> 
> regards,
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 1/30/08, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see Leonard is currently doing a lot of work on something called "tomahawk
> > 1.2", which surprised me a little.
> >
> > I have checked the mail archives, and see some discussions happening around
> > june 2007 regarding having a version of tomahawk specifically for JSF1.2.
> >
> > But since then, we have started "apache commons". I think therefore that
> > rather than have a tomahawk 1.2, it would be better to split tomahawk up
> > into pieces that live in "commons" modules, or at least extract all the bits
> > we can, then call the remaining bits something other than "tomahawk".
> >
> > Tomahawk code is really rather old and crusty and I don't see a lot of point
> > moving it as-is to JSF1.2.
> >
> > Getting a release of tomahawk 1.1.7 out, however, would be a very good idea.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Simon
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> http://www.irian.at
> 
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
> 
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to