My thoughts: 1. Release 1.1.7 with moving some of the non-render components from sandbox (I think the PPR would be better in a new library personally) 2. (Rest are post 1.1.7) move any components that work with any render kit, and are graphical into a new project (or make this tomahawk 2.0) 3. move any components that are not graphical and work with any render kit into commons 4. move any components that are not graphical and are for the stock render kit only into a new library (subForm?) 5. move any dojo components into a new library (is this all of the PPR?)
I would also recommend the adoption of the maven plugin for any new projects, a facelets jar sub-project for each and perhaps a sandbox for each. On Jan 30, 2008 7:18 AM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ---- Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > I am very invested in Tomahawk. I agree we need to simplify things, but > > we MUST maintain Tomahawk. If we do not, then who will use ANY of the > > MyFaces component libraries if we let libraries die. > > Absolutely nobody is suggesting that Tomahawk 1.1.x will be abandoned. > Existing users will *not* be left without bugfixes. > > And nobody is suggesting that we should not have JSF1.2 compatibility in > Tomahawk. Tomahawk 1.1.x runs fine on MyFaces 1.2.x right now. > > Regards, Simon >
