I can certainly make an alpha release. I don't think that would be an
issue at all.
Scott
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
something like
1.0.0.1-alpha would be OK, since it is not a SNAPSHOT
;-)
On Feb 12, 2008 6:49 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that means we need a release of the -SNAPSHOT, when we want a new
Trinidad release ;-)
-M
On Feb 12, 2008 6:23 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey everyone,
I've been tinkering with some alternatives to handling TRINIDAD-134.
This patch appears to have never been applied. The proposal with the
patch was to change a line in StateManagerImpl from:
Application.createComponent(UIViewRoot.COMPONENT_TYPE)
to
Application.getViewHandler().createView(context, null);
The issue with this is that createView does some other things which may
have unforeseen side effects. Furthermore there is a slight cost in
performance on using createView over createComponent.
I believe using the JSR-301 API's I can modify this patch to continue to
use createComponent and, only when in a portal environment, perform the
additional work to properly wrap the UIViewRoot. This will add a build
time dependency on the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT portlet-bridge api.
This is a BUILD TIME dependency only and the code will be written such
that the bridge API is not needed in the class path unless Trinidad is
being run in a portlet environment.
Does anyone have an objection to this?
Scott
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
