something like 1.0.0.1-alpha would be OK, since it is not a SNAPSHOT ;-) On Feb 12, 2008 6:49 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that means we need a release of the -SNAPSHOT, when we want a new > Trinidad release ;-) > > -M > > > On Feb 12, 2008 6:23 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > > > I've been tinkering with some alternatives to handling TRINIDAD-134. > > This patch appears to have never been applied. The proposal with the > > patch was to change a line in StateManagerImpl from: > > > > Application.createComponent(UIViewRoot.COMPONENT_TYPE) > > > > to > > > > Application.getViewHandler().createView(context, null); > > > > The issue with this is that createView does some other things which may > > have unforeseen side effects. Furthermore there is a slight cost in > > performance on using createView over createComponent. > > > > I believe using the JSR-301 API's I can modify this patch to continue to > > use createComponent and, only when in a portal environment, perform the > > additional work to properly wrap the UIViewRoot. This will add a build > > time dependency on the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT portlet-bridge api. > > > > This is a BUILD TIME dependency only and the code will be written such > > that the bridge API is not needed in the class path unless Trinidad is > > being run in a portlet environment. > > > > Does anyone have an objection to this? > > > > Scott > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org >
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
