Sure, that will be changed. On the current website the publish date is displayed the, i think we can leave it like that, right?
regards, Catalin On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do have another followup comment. At the top of the page is a > "version"... This makes total sense if we are navigating a project > (like MyFaces core) but it makes less sense if the content is being > retrieved from a source tree that doesn't have any releases (like the > MyFaces and Portlet Bridge "site" projects). Is that version tag part > of a site template? If so, I would say that when not navigating a > project, this should be blank. > > Scott > > Scott O'Bryan wrote: > > +1 from me. Excellent work. > > > > I also wouldn't mind switching to XDOC for the Download pages on the > > portlet bridge if we have to, but I'd want to move the MyFaces > > downloads page as well. It's far to easy to do a "cut and paste" over > > the new "release" block. If we don't do this, I'm okay with the > > limitations of APT regardless. > > > > Catalin Kormos wrote: > >> I would like to ask for your opinion before starting to commit the > >> new MyFaces Maven skin (based on the designs Adonis provided). Please > >> have a look at [1] for a quick preview, it's not the entire website, > >> so most of the links don't work, but most of the elements that have > >> been customized can be seen. It's a bit different from what you can > >> see at [2], on which the community agreed on, mainly because there is > >> not much / not at all freedom available for customizing the markup of > >> the sections in the main content. Also you can notice a difference > >> between some tables (for example between the ones on the downloads > >> page and the ones on the mailing lists page), as tables generated > >> from an APT doc, don't render <th> elements, but from XDoc docs they > >> are available (the XDoc format is much more flexible here, and in > >> general); the next release of Maven Doxia, as far as i've seen, will > >> fix the issue with the headers. > >> > >> If you don't find anything in particular wrong and you agree that we > >> can live with these small issues for a while, i will apply the new > >> skin over all the projects, and add new logos where we have (for > >> example for the Portlet Bridge project). > >> > >> [1] > >> http://people.apache.org/~ckormos/myfaces/website/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/website/> > >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/website/> > >> [2] > >> > http://people.apache.org/~ckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png<http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png> > >> < > http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png > > > >> > >> > >> regards, > >> Catalin > >> > >> ------------ > >> Codebeat > >> www.codebeat.ro <http://www.codebeat.ro> > > > > -- ------------ Codebeat www.codebeat.ro
