Yeah, that would be most helpful I think..  Once again, good work.

Scott

Catalin Kormos wrote:
Sure, that will be changed. On the current website the publish date is displayed the, i think we can leave it like that, right?

regards,
Catalin

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    I do have another followup comment.  At the top of the page is a
    "version"...  This makes total sense if we are navigating a project
    (like MyFaces core) but it makes less sense if the content is being
    retrieved from a source tree that doesn't have any releases (like the
    MyFaces and Portlet Bridge "site" projects).  Is that version tag part
    of a site template?  If so, I would say that when not navigating a
    project, this should be blank.

    Scott

    Scott O'Bryan wrote:
    > +1 from me.  Excellent work.
    >
    > I also wouldn't mind switching to XDOC for the Download pages on the
    > portlet bridge if we have to, but I'd want to move the MyFaces
    > downloads page as well.  It's far to easy to do a "cut and
    paste" over
    > the new "release" block.  If we don't do this, I'm okay with the
    > limitations of APT regardless.
    >
    > Catalin Kormos wrote:
    >> I would like to ask for your opinion before starting to commit the
    >> new MyFaces Maven skin (based on the designs Adonis provided).
    Please
    >> have a look at [1] for a quick preview, it's not the entire
    website,
    >> so most of the links don't work, but most of the elements that have
    >> been customized can be seen.  It's a bit different from what
    you can
    >> see at [2], on which the community agreed on, mainly because
    there is
    >> not much / not at all freedom available for customizing the
    markup of
    >> the sections in the main content. Also you can notice a difference
    >> between some tables (for example between the ones on the downloads
    >> page and the ones on the mailing lists page), as tables generated
    >> from an APT doc, don't render <th> elements, but from XDoc docs
    they
    >> are available (the XDoc format is much more flexible here, and in
    >> general); the next release of Maven Doxia, as far as i've seen,
    will
    >> fix the issue with the headers.
    >>
    >> If you don't find anything in particular wrong and you agree
    that we
    >> can live with these small issues for a while, i will apply the new
    >> skin over all the projects, and add new logos where we have (for
    >> example for the Portlet Bridge project).
    >>
    >> [1] http://people.apache.org/~ckormos/myfaces/website/
    <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/website/>
    >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/website/>
    >> [2]
    >>
    http://people.apache.org/~ckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png
    <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png>
    >>
    <http://people.apache.org/%7Eckormos/myfaces/vote/myfaces_vote_design_4.png>
    >>
    >>
    >> regards,
    >> Catalin
    >>
    >> ------------
    >> Codebeat
    >> www.codebeat.ro <http://www.codebeat.ro> <http://www.codebeat.ro>
    >




--
------------
Codebeat
www.codebeat.ro <http://www.codebeat.ro>

Reply via email to