On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I understand, but when one mailing list member is holding up > progress by providing only negative, non-constructive feedback and > even admits that his own branch of the thread has ceased to be useful,
perhaps due to my lack of English these comments didn't sound that "non-constructive" I understood them as a valid concerns, which IMO legitimate to share them. BTW. here is an interesting FAQ ([1]) > it is important to be able to let the other members of the community > have a say. This was the only way to stop unnecessary bickering from I still don't like stopping contribtions that way... ...and we should keep the "discussion" open.... > going on without end. As long as people are contributing helpful > feedback and are attempting to further the discussion and help make > proposals on how to fix problems, instead of just making negative > comments on how people work, then that feedback is welcome. -Matthias [1] http://wicket.sourceforge.net/faqs.html#why-final > > > > On 4/14/08, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Andrew Robinson > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you are not a member of MyFaces, Committer or PMC member please > > > refrain from further reply to this thread as your feedback has already > > > been noted. > > > > as an asf member I really don't like statements like that... > > a strong community builds a strong product so, why not > > listening to contributors? > > > > -M > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Cristi Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > A lot of Trinidad renderers have some "override useful" methods as > > private > > > > or protected final. > > > > This makes customizing renderers a nasty job. > > > > > > > > - first these methods obviously can't be overriden > > > > - then when trying to override some public/protected methods, > > > > it's hard because they use other private methods that you can't use > > in > > > > your overriden method > > > > > > > > I assume this come from the fact that Trinidad wasn't open-source in > > its > > > > origins... or? > > > > Do we still have reasons to keep it this way? > > > > > > > > IMO we could make those protected final "override useful" methods to > > > > protected > > > > and the private methods used in those methods, make them protected > > final. > > > > > > > > What's you opinion on this? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > > > Cristi Toth > > > > > > > > ------------- > > > > Codebeat > > > > www.codebeat.ro > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > further stuff: > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
