Perhaps you should file a JIRA ticket and give us a prototype so that we
can discuss a more concrete example.
Scott
Andrew Robinson wrote:
I agree partially with ending this thread, but not 100%. The thread
still lives on as a discussion to see if having sub-renderers
instantiated via the renderkit using renderer types is a desired
improvement to the core renderers. If it is, there is an open
discussion that Simon has addressed on how to customize the value of
properties that a renderer uses from the FacesBean without using
inheritance.
Tthat part of the thread has not reached a resolution, and although it
may be viewed as a sub-thread, it still warrants further discussion
and other view points.
-Andrew
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Andy Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ravi, All -
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Ravindra Adireddy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Extending complex trinidad components like table, treeTable is complex job
> > due to final, private and default access modifier methods in components
> > renderer and components class.
> >
>
>
> I am thinking that it is perhaps time to put this thread to rest.
> (It's been fun, but, hey, all good things come to an end, right?)
seriously, I agree on that
-M
>
> Perhaps we should follow Stephen's lead and start opening up new
> threads to discuss particular cases where improved extensibility is
> required.
>
> Ravi - would you mind starting a new thread to address the table
> extensibility question?
>
> Andy
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
