I am agreement with the others that would like to see case by case JIRA issues to choose to open up renderers since it is considered taboo (spelling it right this time).
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Cristi Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Dividing this thread is the best thing. > But I think we either reached a conclusion or we should start a vote about > final/private methods > > We can change current final/private renderer methods to not final / > protected ones, > only when needed, on specific use cases !!! > > If somebody still disagrees with the previous conclusion, the we should > start a vote. > If not, we should take this as a fact from now on. > > After we reach a conclusion on the other thread (sub-renderers), > we should have a wiki page or a documentation page on extending Trinidad > renderers. > > Thanks for the extensive feedback (positive and negative)! > > Best regards, > > -- > Cristi Toth > > ------------- > Codebeat > www.codebeat.ro > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks. I think that would be best. :) > > > > > > > > > > Andrew Robinson wrote: > > > > > I'll start a new thread though to clean up the email mess > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Andrew Robinson > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > There is already code in: > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/trinidad/branches/ar_subRendererPerfTesting > > > > > > > > As for JIRA, I don't feel that that is a place for discussions. If a > > > > decision is made, then I will create an issue. > > > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Perhaps you should file a JIRA ticket and give us a prototype so > that we can > > > > > discuss a more concrete example. > > > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew Robinson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I agree partially with ending this thread, but not 100%. The > thread > > > > > > still lives on as a discussion to see if having sub-renderers > > > > > > instantiated via the renderkit using renderer types is a desired > > > > > > improvement to the core renderers. If it is, there is an open > > > > > > discussion that Simon has addressed on how to customize the value > of > > > > > > properties that a renderer uses from the FacesBean without using > > > > > > inheritance. > > > > > > > > > > > > Tthat part of the thread has not reached a resolution, and > although it > > > > > > may be viewed as a sub-thread, it still warrants further > discussion > > > > > > and other view points. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Matthias Wessendorf > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Andy Schwartz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ravi, All - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Ravindra Adireddy > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Extending complex trinidad components like table, > treeTable is > > > > > complex job > > > > > > > > > due to final, private and default access modifier methods > in > > > > > components > > > > > > > > > renderer and components class. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am thinking that it is perhaps time to put this thread to > rest. > > > > > > > > (It's been fun, but, hey, all good things come to an end, > right?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seriously, I agree on that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -M > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps we should follow Stephen's lead and start opening > up new > > > > > > > > threads to discuss particular cases where improved > extensibility is > > > > > > > > required. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ravi - would you mind starting a new thread to address the > table > > > > > > > > extensibility question? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
