@andrew: it depends on the mother tongue. ;) for some of you 'seven' sounds boring - especially if english is your mother tongue. words of foreign languages sound much more interesting. if i translate 'seven' into my mother tongue, it also sounds a bit boring (just because it isn't exotic for me). in my country it's a kind of "trend" to use english words.
so maybe we should just use an "invented" name or an acronym. e.g.: jac (*j*ava *a*nnotation *c*hecker) jack (*j*ava *a*nnotation *c*hec*k*er) if you translate e.g. 'jack' into my mother tongue, there are a lot of different meanings. so there is no real meaning - it just sounds interesting (it's a matter of taste). regards, gerhard 2008/5/10 Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Some spanish words: > > myfaces-commons-validacion > myfaces-commons-validar > myfaces-commons-validador > myfaces-commons-valide > myfaces-commons-evaluador > > > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> +1 for myfaces-commons-checker. >> >> >> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Gerhard Petracek < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> do you have a further suggestion? >>> maybe a bit more fancy? >>> >>> e.g. one of the suggestions i heard is: >>> myfaces-commons-checker >>> >>> maybe it's a new starting point for further suggestions. >>> >>> regards, >>> gerhard >>> >>> >>> >>> 2008/4/29 Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> How about "convalidi". It's validate in Italian (I think). >>>> >>>> Gerhard Petracek wrote: >>>> >>>>> hello scott, >>>>> >>>>> do you have a suggestion for a short and fancy name? >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> gerhard >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2008/4/27 Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: >>>>> >>>>> +1 to not naming it validations. There is already a commons >>>>> validator. >>>>> >>>>> -0 to including core in the name >>>>> >>>>> Strong -1 to including JSR in the project name. A jar is nearly >>>>> an enhancement number for java. You wouln't name your project >>>>> something like MyFaces-1234 after a Jira ticket number. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 26, 2008, at 10:25 AM, "Gerhard Petracek" >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> hello alexander, >>>>>> >>>>>> i got your idea. >>>>>> however, i hope we will find a short and fancy name. >>>>>> >>>>>> if we don't have 'core' within the name, i think we have to find >>>>>> something else than just 'validation'. >>>>>> otherwise it will be a bit confusing for users due to the fact >>>>>> that the core itself doesn't validate. >>>>>> concrete validation logic is located within the >>>>>> independent/optional modules. >>>>>> the target is to have a core which provides the infrastructure >>>>>> and which encapsulates the specifics of the jsf version. >>>>>> furthermore, the core is independent of specific annotations. the >>>>>> optional modules provide the concrete annotations and/or >>>>>> validation logic (independent of the jsf version). >>>>>> (reason for and/or: we don't provide the annotations of jpa nor >>>>>> of jsr 303 - we just provide the validation strategies for these >>>>>> external annotations.) >>>>>> >>>>>> @myfaces-commons-validation-annotations: >>>>>> it isn't a pure annotation module - it also provides the >>>>>> validation strategies and much more. >>>>>> (in the case of the jpa validation support it just provides the >>>>>> validation strategy.) >>>>>> moreover, i would suggest that we rename seven-validation to >>>>>> seven-ext-validation or a bit shorter: seven-extval (for extended >>>>>> validation) >>>>>> or something similar which indicates that these are our >>>>>> annotations (and so on). >>>>>> >>>>>> @myfaces-commons-validation-jsr303: >>>>>> i'm fine with both jsr303 (my original suggestion) or >>>>>> bean-validation >>>>>> >>>>>> the names of our compromise so far: >>>>>> >>>>>> myfaces-commons-[new name] >>>>>> (= the core) >>>>>> >>>>>> myfaces-commons-[new name]-validation >>>>>> (= our annotations + validation strategies incl. cross-component >>>>>> validation infrastructure and also the jpa validation strategy,...) >>>>>> >>>>>> myfaces-commons-[new name]-bean-validation >>>>>> (= the infrastructure and validation strategies to support jsr 303) >>>>>> >>>>>> fancy suggestions for [new name] are welcome. >>>>>> (we need some suggestions to open a vote.) >>>>>> >>>>>> or what's about something different >>>>>> it isn't my favourite - however, it might be an impulse for other >>>>>> suggestions. >>>>>> >>>>>> e.g.: >>>>>> myfaces-commons-validation-core >>>>>> myfaces-commons-validation-extval >>>>>> myfaces-commons-validation-jsr303 (or bean-validation) >>>>>> >>>>>> (i prefer an independent name.) >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> gerhard >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2008/4/25 Jesse Alexander (KSFH 336) >>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> we are getting side-tracked... >>>>>> let's find a name within this thread! :) >>>>>> >>>>>> validation ? >>>>>> -> >>>>>> myfaces-commons-validation >>>>>> myfaces-commons-validation-annotations (was -validation) >>>>>> myfaces-commons-validation-jsr303 (was bean-validation) >>>>>> kind regards >>>>>> Alexander >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> http://www.irian.at >>>>>> >>>>>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>>>>> Courses in English and German >>>>>> >>>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> http://www.irian.at >>>>> >>>>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>>>> Courses in English and German >>>>> >>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> http://www.irian.at >>> >>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>> Courses in English and German >>> >>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed >> http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog >> > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
