+1 for that
I wanted to host my project I am working on under
the Tomahawk umbrella since I rely on tomahawk
code but since maven can resolve the dependencies
I am fine with being in a dedicated web 2.0
subproject as well.

Werner


Gerhard Petracek schrieb:
hello,

as i know the names changed - see [1]:
-> we vote on a new subproject for libs like flexfaces.

myfaces-alchemy
 |_ myfaces-flexfaces
 |_ ... (e.g. the javascript project werner is working on)

that's the reason why i said:
 > i prefer to have the mentioned discussion before such a vote.

regards,
gerhard

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg32526.html



2008/6/3 Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:

     > I'm still voting -1 on having a flash-based project within MyFaces
     > unless someone can show that this code works with a non-proprietory
     > Flash player.

    I doubt that.

     >
     > I'd be happy to see this project succeed, but not here at Apache.
    This
     > foundation exists to promote open source software, not provide
    wrappers
     > for proprietory tools.

    true.
    on the incubator list was not much interested in that project as well.
    perhaps google code or codehaus may be the right place ?

     >
     > Regards,
     > Simon
     >
     >



    --
    Matthias Wessendorf

    further stuff:
    blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
    sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
    mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org




--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to