I only suggested leaving it as it is *if* it is possible to use this
component with tables other than t:dataTable.

On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 15:57 +0300, Hazem Saleh wrote:
> OK Let's make this as a vote :
> we now have :
> -> 2 votes for supporting the feature inside the t:dataTable.
> -> 1 vote for leaving the current component as is.
> 
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 3:13 PM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>         A separate component would be nice if it could be applied to
>         any table,
>         eg the h:dataTable.
>         
>         
>         On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 13:40 +0300, Hazem Saleh wrote:
>         > +1 for Matzew idea.
>         > I think that the old component syntax was suitable for the
>         component
>         > when it was in the sandbox phase.
>         > I will implement this idea, it is good.
>         > Thanks Matzew!
>         >
>         > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
>         > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>         >         On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Hazem Saleh
>         >         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>         >         > Hi Team,
>         >         >
>         >         > After updating the selectOneRow component's
>         documentation.
>         >
>         >
>         >         just curious, what is this component about?
>         >         Using it like this ?
>         >
>         >         <t:table .....>
>         >          <s:selectOneRow />
>         >         </t:able>
>         >
>         >         If so, how to declare multiple row selection ?
>         >
>         >         Trinidad's table doesn't treat that as a special
>         case. It just
>         >         has an
>         >         attribute for that, where you specify via an enum
>         the
>         >         selection type
>         >         (single:mulit)
>         >
>         >         Greetings,
>         >         Matthias
>         >
>         >
>         >         >
>         >         > I wish to promote it to the next Tomahawk release.
>         >         >
>         >         > [+1] for agreeing with promoting the component to
>         the next
>         >         Tomahawk release.
>         >         > [-1] for disagreeing with promoting the component
>         to the
>         >         next Tomahawk
>         >         > release.
>         >         >
>         >         > Thanks all very much!
>         >         >
>         >         > --
>         >         > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
>         >         > http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         --
>         >         Matthias Wessendorf
>         >
>         >         further stuff:
>         >         blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>         >         sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>         >         mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > --
>         > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
>         > http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
>         
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
> http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog

Reply via email to