+1

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> +1 for the promotion, as I remember this component was donated to myfaces
> in 2005 by my brother, and I think 3 years is "enough" to live in sandbox.
>
> Cagatay.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> If I understand correctly, the current state of the component is such
>> that it works with any UIData component.   I'm +1 for keeping that
>> status.   It'd be great if we could do something similar with many of
>> the other t:dataTable functionality.
>>
>> On 6/27/08, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I'm +1 to promoting the component in its current state (which I think is
>> >  your -1 option below).
>> >
>> >  Thanks for looking into that.
>> >
>> >  Regards,
>> >
>> > Simon
>> >
>> >
>> >  On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 15:24 +0300, Hazem Saleh wrote:
>> >  > Hi Simon,
>> >  >
>> >  > I found it possible to use it with the h:dataTable as it depends only
>> >  > on (UIData).
>> >  > We have now two paths:
>> >  > [+1] for merging this component as an attribute in <t:dataTable
>> .../>.
>> >  > [-1] for promoting the component to Tomahawk in its current state.
>> >  >
>> >  > Me >> -1 now.
>> >  >
>> >  > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >  >         I think it would be useful to have an answer to my question
>> >  >         first.
>> >  >
>> >  >         *Is* it possible to do this?
>> >  >          <h:dataTable ...>
>> >  >            <s:selectOneRow/>
>> >  >          </h:dataTable>
>> >  >
>> >  >         If so, then moving from the current approach to using an
>> >  >         attribute will
>> >  >         remove existing functionality. Ok, with a sandbox component
>> >  >         that is
>> >  >         allowed but the above looks useful.
>> >  >
>> >  >         Unfortunately I'm really busy on other things at the moment,
>> >  >         and don't
>> >  >         have time to look myself.
>> >  >
>> >  >         Regards,
>> >  >         Simon
>> >  >
>> >  >         Hazem Saleh schrieb:
>> >  >         > Any new votes ?
>> >  >         >
>> >  >         > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 4:13 PM, simon
>> >  >         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >  >
>> >  >         > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> >  >         >
>> >  >         >     I only suggested leaving it as it is *if* it is
>> possible
>> >  >         to use this
>> >  >         >     component with tables other than t:dataTable.
>> >  >         >
>> >  >         >     On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 15:57 +0300, Hazem Saleh wrote:
>> >  >         >     > OK Let's make this as a vote :
>> >  >         >     > we now have :
>> >  >         >     > -> 2 votes for supporting the feature inside the
>> >  >         t:dataTable.
>> >  >         >     > -> 1 vote for leaving the current component as is.
>> >  >         >     >
>> >  >         >     > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 3:13 PM, simon
>> >  >         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >  >
>> >  >         >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>> >  >         >     > wrote:
>> >  >         >     >         A separate component would be nice if it
>> could
>> >  >         be applied to
>> >  >         >     >         any table,
>> >  >         >     >         eg the h:dataTable.
>> >  >         >     >
>> >  >         >     >
>> >  >         >     >         On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 13:40 +0300, Hazem
>> Saleh
>> >  >         wrote:
>> >  >         >     >         > +1 for Matzew idea.
>> >  >         >     >         > I think that the old component syntax was
>> >  >         suitable for the
>> >  >         >     >         component
>> >  >         >     >         > when it was in the sandbox phase.
>> >  >         >     >         > I will implement this idea, it is good.
>> >  >         >     >         > Thanks Matzew!
>> >  >         >     >         >
>> >  >         >     >         > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Matthias
>> >  >         Wessendorf
>> >  >
>> >  >         >     >         > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >  >         <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> >  >         >     >         >         On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:16 PM,
>> >  >         Hazem Saleh
>> >  >
>> >  >         >     >         >         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >  >         <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>> >  >
>> >  >         >     wrote:
>> >  >         >     >         >         > Hi Team,
>> >  >         >     >         >         >
>> >  >         >     >         >         > After updating the selectOneRow
>> >  >         component's
>> >  >         >     >         documentation.
>> >  >         >     >         >
>> >  >         >     >         >
>> >  >         >     >         >         just curious, what is this
>> component
>> >  >         about?
>> >  >         >     >         >         Using it like this ?
>> >  >         >     >         >
>> >  >         >     >         >         <t:table .....>
>> >  >         >     >         >          <s:selectOneRow />
>> >  >         >     >         >         </t:able>
>> >  >         >     >         >
>> >  >         >     >         >         If so, how to declare multiple row
>> >  >         selection ?
>> >  >         >     >         >
>> >  >         >     >         >         Trinidad's table doesn't treat that
>> >  >         as a special
>> >  >         >     >         case. It just
>> >  >         >     >         >         has an
>> >  >         >     >         >         attribute for that, where you
>> >  >         specify via an enum
>> >  >         >     >         the
>> >  >         >     >         >         selection type
>> >  >         >     >         >         (single:mulit)
>> >  >         >     >         >
>> >  >         >     >         >         Greetings,
>> >  >         >     >         >         Matthias
>> >  >         >     >         >
>> >  >         >     >         >
>> >  >         >     >         >         >
>> >  >         >     >         >         > I wish to promote it to the next
>> >  >         Tomahawk
>> >  >         >     release.
>> >  >         >     >         >         >
>> >  >         >     >         >         > [+1] for agreeing with promoting
>> >  >         the
>> >  >         >     component to
>> >  >         >     >         the next
>> >  >         >     >         >         Tomahawk release.
>> >  >         >     >         >         > [-1] for disagreeing with
>> >  >         promoting the
>> >  >         >     component
>> >  >         >     >         to the
>> >  >         >     >         >         next Tomahawk
>> >  >         >     >         >         > release.
>> >  >         >
>> >  >
>> >  >
>> >  >
>> >  >
>> >  >
>> >  > --
>> >  > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
>> >  > http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to