Hi,
2008/6/25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> While code duplication is never nice, I think it would be better for
> tomahawk 1.1.x and 1.2.x to continue to have these components internally,
> and for commons to have a separate version. It also means that commons can
> clean up the API without breaking tomahawk users. Yes, it does mean having
> to apply fixes in two places (tomahawk, commons) but so does the alternative
> (tomahawk 1.x, commons).
This means to apply fixes in four places: tomahawk1.1, tomahawk1.2,
commons1.1 and commons1.2.
BTW: -1 for the alternative (tomahawk 1.x, commons).
Regards,
Volker
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
>
--
inexso - information exchange solutions GmbH
Bismarckstraße 13 | 26122 Oldenburg
Tel.: +49 441 4082 356 |
FAX: +49 441 4082 355 | www.inexso.de
