Hi all, I am -1 for adding another sub-project.
Put this into the sandbox - and use the new code-generator, please, and upgrade the existing dojo components to the 1.1 version - everything else will make us very unhappy in the end! regards, Martin On 7/7/08, Kito D. Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for subproject. > > > > It'll make it easier to use the same framework for other Ajax libraries, > too, as Werner suggested. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action > <http://www.virtua.com/> http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, > training, and mentoring > <http://www.jsfcentral.com/> http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces > FAQ, news, and info > phone: +1 203-653-2989 > fax: +1 203-653-2988 > > > > Come to the first annual JSFOne Conference this September! Visit > http://www.jsfone.com for details. > > > > From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:32 PM > To: MyFaces Development > Subject: Re: Dojo discussion - opensourcing the jsf dojo components project > > > > Hi! > > > > Ok then those things are cleared up, now back to the original question > sandbox or own subproject? > > +1 for own subproject. > > Any further influence with tomahawk/sandbox needs to be avoided. > These two projects are still waiting for a overhaul themself. > > Ciao, > Mario > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
