I can certainly live with dojo components being in an optional, plug-in subproject of Tomahawk - they should then however use Tomahawk infrastructure, the generator-environment and work together with its components.
regards, Martin On 7/10/08, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can see the point of that argument, but worry that putting heavy 3rd > party JS libraries into Tomahawk will steer people away from using it. > IMO, Dojo based components should either be (1) in a new MyFaces top > project, or in (2) a subproject of Tomahawk (i.e. > myfaces-tomahawk-dojo). > > #2 has its advantages of being part of Tomahawk, but being optional in > its deployment. > > -Andrew > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Martin Marinschek > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Mario, >> >> I do not fancy YACL (yet another component library). Really not. There >> is some cool stuff in Werner's proposal, and I think it might be nice >> if it is carefully integrated into tomahawk without breaking the other >> stuff that is there. I do strongly think that we cannot afford the >> community split another component library would bring with it. >> >> regards, >> >> Martin >> >> On 7/10/08, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Werner Punz schrieb: >>>> Martin Marinschek schrieb: >>>>> In any case, I remain -1 to add a new component library - I am sorry. >>>>> >>>> Ok I am going to postpone this discussion until I can showcase something >>>> then we can start it over... >>> Hmm ... was Martin's -1 a veto or did he just express his opinion. >>> Martin, how do we have to count your -1? >>> >>> Ciao, >>> Mario >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >> JSF Consulting, Development and >> Courses in English and German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
