also, the sandbox renderer approach sounds good so far. However, you should ensure we don't break a lot of things
-Matthias On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Simon Lessard > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Yes I think Adam made a wiki for UIXNode conversion during the time of >> incubation, I'll have to look for the link. >> >> As for JSF 2.0 adoption, I would say 2 years after the specification release >> which is... not so soon. Implementation will start before that though and I >> think it's what important for our side. So personally I would say clean up >> the code... a lot as not only UIXNode need it, but wait for JSF 2.0 so that > > +1 on an earlier clean-up than to wait on JSF 2 to do the clean-up. > >> our cleaning reflect JSF 2.0 changes, but working in a 1.2 environment. I >> gully agree about 1.0 trunk, I have no motivation at all about it. > > yes. And with the advent of Trinidad2/JSF2 we also should send Trinidad 1.2 > to maintaining stage (sure some bug fixes don't hurt) >> >> >> Regards, >> >> ~ Simon >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Andrew Robinson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> > However, as Matthias pointed out, JSF 2.0 standardize Trinidad's >>> > principal >>> > core features namely PPR and Resource handling and hopefully skinning >>> > too. >>> > Under such circumstances, I feel that we should wait for 2.0 to be >>> > cemented >>> > before going through a massive refactoring of some of the old and >>> > twisted >>> > code parts so that the refactored design is fully compatible with 1.2, >>> > but >>> > using 2.0 concept to make the upgrade to 2.0 easier imho. >>> >>> Although those are really good concerns, I wonder how long it will >>> take JSF2 to be adopted. It seems like many are even reluctant to >>> adopt 1.2. So I wonder if it is still worth it for us to make an >>> effort to at least clean up the 1.2 trunk? (I did not mention the 1.0 >>> trunk as I seem to have lost my desire to maintain the JSF 1.1 code >>> myself) >>> >>> I guess it comes down to time and desire. I worry about the UIXNode >>> conversion as I don't yet fully understand that code enough to feel >>> comfortable porting it without missing things. I guess I could create >>> sandbox renderers for the components, then if they look complete, we >>> could promote them & replace the UIXNode ones at that time. Is there a >>> WIKI page that I missed that talks about how to convert these guys or >>> about any of the UIXNode architecture? >>> >>> -Andrew >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
