Since it doesn't render anything, perhaps it should?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about Simon's suggestion that we promote it to commons instead of > Tomahawk? Any reason not to go down that path? > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Refactoring is done. >> Tomorrow will promote the component to Tomahawk. >> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> We are one team. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Andrew Robinson >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hazem, >>>> >>>> I have been really busy, thank you for volunteering to promote my >>>> component, I really appreciate it. >>>> >>>> -Andrew >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> > Hi Simon, >>>> > >>>> > I can work on this task. >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Hi All, >>>> >> >>>> >> There was a discussion a while ago on this list about promoting the >>>> >> sandbox s:limitRendered component (written by Andrew Robinson) into >>>> >> tomahawk. >>>> >> >>>> >> There seemed to be general agreement that it was useful, but that some >>>> >> rework should be done, including: >>>> >> * renaming to t:renderOne >>>> >> * simplifying so that it only supports rendering one child, not N. >>>> >> * improving the documentation. >>>> >> >>>> >> There was also discussion about whether it should go into Tomahawk or >>>> >> into the new commons-components module (as it doesn't actually render >>>> >> any html). >>>> >> >>>> >> Although it was agreed to promote into Tomahawk, it looks like nothing >>>> >> actually happened. I was reminded of this today, as I found a >>>> >> situation >>>> >> where it would have been very useful... >>>> >> >>>> >> I'm just reminding people that it exists. I'm off on holiday soon for >>>> >> a >>>> >> few weeks so won't be able to do anything in the near future, but if >>>> >> no-one has dealt with it before I'm back then I intend to do the >>>> >> agreed >>>> >> work to get it ready for promotion. >>>> >> >>>> >> Cheers, >>>> >> Simon >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed >>>> > >>>> > Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets): >>>> > >>>> > http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370 >>>> > >>>> > Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog >>>> > >>>> > [Web 2.0] Google Maps Integration with JSF: >>>> > http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/ >>>> > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=51250 >>>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed >>> >>> Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets): >>> >>> http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370 >>> >>> Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog >>> >>> [Web 2.0] Google Maps Integration with JSF: >>> http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/ >>> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=51250 >> >> >> >> -- >> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed >> >> Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets): >> http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370 >> >> Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog >> >> [Web 2.0] Google Maps Integration with JSF: >> http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/ >> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=51250 >> >
