sounds good to me. regards, gerhard
2008/11/13 Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Since it doesn't render anything, perhaps it should? > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > What about Simon's suggestion that we promote it to commons instead of > > Tomahawk? Any reason not to go down that path? > > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Refactoring is done. > >> Tomorrow will promote the component to Tomahawk. > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> We are one team. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Andrew Robinson > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hazem, > >>>> > >>>> I have been really busy, thank you for volunteering to promote my > >>>> component, I really appreciate it. > >>>> > >>>> -Andrew > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>>> > Hi Simon, > >>>> > > >>>> > I can work on this task. > >>>> > > >>>> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Simon Kitching < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Hi All, > >>>> >> > >>>> >> There was a discussion a while ago on this list about promoting the > >>>> >> sandbox s:limitRendered component (written by Andrew Robinson) into > >>>> >> tomahawk. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> There seemed to be general agreement that it was useful, but that > some > >>>> >> rework should be done, including: > >>>> >> * renaming to t:renderOne > >>>> >> * simplifying so that it only supports rendering one child, not N. > >>>> >> * improving the documentation. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> There was also discussion about whether it should go into Tomahawk > or > >>>> >> into the new commons-components module (as it doesn't actually > render > >>>> >> any html). > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Although it was agreed to promote into Tomahawk, it looks like > nothing > >>>> >> actually happened. I was reminded of this today, as I found a > >>>> >> situation > >>>> >> where it would have been very useful... > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I'm just reminding people that it exists. I'm off on holiday soon > for > >>>> >> a > >>>> >> few weeks so won't be able to do anything in the near future, but > if > >>>> >> no-one has dealt with it before I'm back then I intend to do the > >>>> >> agreed > >>>> >> work to get it ready for promotion. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Cheers, > >>>> >> Simon > >>>> >> > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > -- > >>>> > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed > >>>> > > >>>> > Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets): > >>>> > > >>>> > > http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370 > >>>> > > >>>> > Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog > >>>> > > >>>> > [Web 2.0] Google Maps Integration with JSF: > >>>> > http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/ > >>>> > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=51250 > >>>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed > >>> > >>> Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets): > >>> > >>> > http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370 > >>> > >>> Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog > >>> > >>> [Web 2.0] Google Maps Integration with JSF: > >>> http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/ > >>> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=51250 > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed > >> > >> Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets): > >> > http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370 > >> > >> Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog > >> > >> [Web 2.0] Google Maps Integration with JSF: > >> http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/ > >> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=51250 > >> > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
