+1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hey community, > > > > Oracle is trying to open up a new JSR for the Portlet 2.0 Bridge. > > Originally this was part of the JSR-301 but there was a slight > > misunderstanding of the intentions of the specs regarding release dates. > To > > make a long story short, instead of doing both the specifications for > > Portlet 1.0 and 2.0 as part of the JSR, it's being split up. The Project > > lead will be Michael Freedman who is a MyFaces committer and has been > very > > active on the Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge project and he was also the > > spec-lead for the JSR-301. The Apache implementations of these > > specifications are being written as the eventual R.I.'s for the bridge > > projects. > > > > In any case, should Apache MyFaces put its vote in for the formation of > this > > JSR? Understand that this is not a vote for a project or spec, just to > > allow the JCP to start a JSR to support this project. I have gotten word > > from Apache that this can be done if a community decides to support it. > > Since the Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge is being developed as the > eventual > > R.I. and Oracle has been very open to aiding the OpenSource development > of > > this bridge here at Apache, I think it's a good opportunity for us to > > support the JCP and, in particular, the Portlet Bridge Projects. > > > > Vote: > > > > [X ] +1 to support the formation of a new JSR for the Portlet Bridge 2.0 > +1 > > [ ] +0 don't really care, it's just a silly green checkmark on the ballot > > [ ] -1 don't put the green checkmark on the ballot, Apache shouldn't > support > > the JCP > > > > Thanks, > > Scott O'Bryan > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Grant Smith
